| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Cooper v. Hobart ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Cooper v Hobart
''Cooper v Hobart'', () 3 S.C.R. 537, 2001 SCC 79, is a Supreme Court of Canada case that redefined the Anns test, which was adopted in ''Kamloops v. Nielsen'' to establish a duty of care in civil tort cases.
== Background ==
Eron was a mortgage broker under the ''Mortgage Broker's Act''. Cooper had advanced money to Eron. Eron’s mortgage license was suspended by Hobart acting in his official capacity as Mortgage Broker Registrar under the Act.
Cooper alleges that Hobart breached a duty of care that he allegedly owed to her and other investors because he had been aware of the serious violations of the Act committed by Eron, and not suspended its license soon enough. The Registrar of Mortgage Brokers had become aware of Eron on August 1996 and did not suspend his licence until October 1997.
At trial the Registrar was found to have owed a duty of care to the investors. In appeal, the Court overturned the verdict on grounds that there was no sufficient proximity.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Cooper v Hobart」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|